Jul 23, 2015

Its officially a Race.

Recently, we were filling some government paperwork and just like every other time before, we were asked to identify our race. This questions is never mandatory, however, it has a way of snaking itself into important decision making. Since Nikhil had completed the paperwork online and with his attention to detail, all the T’s are crossed and I’s dotted, this question was correctly and completely answered.
Although we had an audience of two other people, I politely told Nikhil that I never want to answer this question, unless mandatory. Almost immediately, and with equal civility, our witness thought it was necessary to clarify that the race classification is to ensure that we have not been discriminated against. That this is a neutral process, neither leaning towards affirmative action nor prejudiced.
I thanked him and confirmed that I was aware of this approach, and that in principle do not agree with the existence of this question – please identify your race. The gentleman I was talking to became surprisingly uncomfortable, even amused at my unexpected request. But there is a background to all this.
In general, discrimination is stereotyping and prejudice that impacts behavior of the person holding the bias. So unless the ‘victim’ specifically identifies the exact nature of bias, it actually hard to say the kind of discrimination you have faced. As a legal alien, I have been discriminated against in more countries than just America. However, the most discrimination I have faced has been in my own country. Ironic that it is the single nation in the world that harbors most cultural diversity. To what I can recollect, I have been discriminated with staggering variety - being a female, being educated compared to masses, for being a proletariat amongst elite, caste, religion, for being single or for being married, being too young or too old – whatever applies, for being a north Indian in south India, for studying in Kendriya Vidyalaya, for being a social worker, for being a corporate woman, for being a Delhi-ite, for being a Punjabi, for being a city dweller visiting a village and for perhaps many reasons that I could not even clearly distinguish.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not in an “it-only-happens-to-me” syndrome. I am not picking any personal example where people’s tolerance was tested when I was being myself, rather I am picking situations where I was fit into a stereotype and subsequent actions were taken in alignment with the said prejudice. Where any person with a common context as mine would be subjected to similar biases.
Again, don’t get me wrong, this is not a petulant rumination of all that was pitted against me. I saw discrimination as being very individual and yet nothing personal. Once I was able to extricate the precise stereotype, it would become easier for me to manage the situation. So over the years, I’ve gotten wired to look for the prejudice and deal with it as if it were screen door to an entrance. This was a battle that was given. Everyday. And this is perhaps the unique story of everyone in India – a nation of diversity where people are desperate to label you as ‘one-of-them’.
And then I moved to America. A country that is exceptionally sensitive to differences amongst people. Sensitive to a fault. Where children are taught to celebrate individual differences and to own their preferences. And yet, as like-minded folks commune they talk about not feeling accepted along with their differences & preferences. The political affiliations, sexual orientation, class, race, gender, physical abilities anything can cause people to disagree. But it gets tricky when the government steps in. When the government lends a validation that people belong to different races and that is the most pervasive prejudice and that they need to be ‘protected’. Additionally, enough research is being done in our current world where race is being hauled to limelight as being a closeted deciding factor. A small but significant and growing section of population in America does not fall under any of the race classifications. America being a multi-cultural melting pot, mixed race children here may find their options for race identity to be limiting. And this is how a prejudice becomes personal.
Sadly, America is still dealing with racial conflicts every day. And every time I have to identify myself with a race, I lend a voice that supports race identification. Of all the times I have been discriminated solely on the basis of my race (in America or the 11 other countries I have visited), it would probably amount to less than 10%. Perhaps I haven’t fully evaluated the cost of all the racial discrimination against me – did it cost me a college seat? Or a job? Or equal pay? I don’t know. But to even recognize race to be a differentiating factor, in my opinion, is not progressive or productive.
Biases don’t offend me and discrimination doesn’t scare me. But to create and maintain differences that impact the social fabric of a country and touch each individual personally, is something I do not support.
So onward I march. Each time I am asked to identify with a race, I chose the ‘skip question’ option

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Aky,

    As usual- A fantastic piece. It is nice to know that the “fire” is still burning inside the belly. No matter how small, such fires are known to have changed the course of history. Who would have thought that expulsion of a meek Indian lawyer from a train in South Africa would rip British Empire of their entire fortune in India? Having said that, and being of investigative mind (a divine curse ☺), I was tempted to do ‘causative analysis’ of racial profiling issue (irrespective of country and geography). Before I launch my barrage of artillery, few disclaimers first. I do not pretend to be an expert in foreign policy making, world politics or macroeconomy. I am a mere soldier, marooned in that isolated part of the world where even basic civil liberties such as freedom of speech and religious/ political orientations have been taken away from me.

    To start, I can’t help but think of “Minority Report”. Pre-cogs predict the future crime. Formidable US security agencies (Govt.), with handsome hunks like Tom Cruise and Collin Farrell, swing into action. In a flash, the future criminal is behind the bars. All works well, until one special Pre-cog (and damn pretty too ☺) reveals too much about the creators of the system. As audience, we are left mesmerizing at the highly intriguing and mystical plot set in 2050. With bated breath, the curtains fall and in unison we utter - Brilliant!

    Well! Why go that far in future? The system is already in place in the times we live. I am baffled with couple of questions. Firstly, how is racial profiling any different from “Pre-Cog based Crime Prevention System”? It is immaterial whether the method is used for crime prevention or for typecasting; one has already been tagged for something (good or bad) that one has not yet done. Secondly, why is such act has state-backing in a country whose foundation is based on Equality, Liberty and Justice? The answers are deep-rooted, incomplete and convoluted. The phenomenon per se is not unique. In fact history is replete with such instances occurring over and over again. Be it racial profiling of Jews in Germany or ethnic cleansing of Croats in Bosnia, the underlying pattern is shockingly simple and repetitive. As part of military history, I learnt about various war campaigns. A careful analysis of socio-political events leading up to modern wars reveals a shockingly simple pattern and attempts to provide the answer to the first question:-

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. A mass hysteria/ threat is created (most often stage managed event either by Government or those who wield power). Fear and psychosis is injected in the society as an aftermath of that threat (think of 9/11 for example)
    2. In response, an “Open” Society slowly becomes “Closed”. Race/Ethnicity based phobia sets in.
    3. Government/ Rulers use this opportunity to centralize power in their own hands.
    4. Civil liberties, which until now were the hallmark of that Open Society, are curtailed or withdrawn by the govt.
    5. Racist sentiment grows. When society sees people in positions of authority acting on the suspicions that the public holds, it legitimizes their bigotry and fear.
    6. Religion, economics, politics and ethnicity are used to convert mass-phobia into “call for action”.
    7. The first one to face the music is the racial minority (read-“The Threat Within”. Think of Jews in Germany).
    8. Under the garb of homeland security or other nationalistic objectives, Govt. pushes it own hidden agenda (either to neutralize a political adversary or for profit-making. Think of Saddam and Iraqi Oil. Where are the weapons of mass destruction? ).

    At this point you might be wondering as to how a simple “Disclose your race” question on a govt. form can lead up to a full scale war? Am I over-reacting? Am I reading too much into it? Think it this way; the same innocent-looking question in Germany was responsible for the deadliest world war ever fought on this planet. Jews paid the price for not belonging to allegedly superior “Aryan Race”. If you think carefully, this not-so-innocent question (in fact completely evil) eventually is the mother of atomic bomb and nuclear race that still rages on. Alarmed? Better be.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As part of answer to the second question, I put forth some more baffling questions:-

    1. America and Soviets were allies in Second World War. Why is it that immediately after war was over, they became the fiercest enemies? America, having invented atomic bomb, became far superior to Soviets and faced no threat. Then why 50 years were spent in cold war with a former ally?
    2. In mid 80s, Taliban and Afghan rebels were completely funded and supported by Americans in their war against Russia. Immediately after the war, why Taliban became the biggest threat for Americans?
    3. Saddam was the closest ally of US in war against Iran. A majority of funding and international support for Saddam was garnered by America. Immediately after Iran-Iraq war, why Saddam became the biggest enemy?
    4. Americans waged war against communism in North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba etc. How can a country, which is so opposed to communism, has chosen another communist country (China) as the most favored economic partner?
    5. Osama-bin-laden was armed to teeth by the Americans. Why did he become the biggest threat to US when his purpose was met?
    6. In spite of Pakistan (a Muslim country) being declared as a terrorist state by western world, US continues to provide military and economic aid. Why?

    To answer this, I have to relinquish the cozy comforts of my military uniform and venture into the unchartered territory-A complex maze of economics. Nothing could be more pleasing to a Capitalist country than running a “Warfare Economy”. It is a known fact that rich and wealthy Americans who own big Corporates also form Govt. (Think of Bush Dynasty). This system – America’s brand of capitalism – functions first and foremost to make extremely rich Americans like the Bush “money dynasty” even richer. Without hot or cold wars, however, this system can no longer produce the expected result in the form of the ever-higher profits.
    The greatest strength of capitalist structure of America is also its greatest weakness – Over-productivity. Automation, mechanization and corporate lust to increase profits result in more supply than demand. I guess in economics its called “Recession” but Americans love to call it “The Great Depression”. It is now almost well established that this phenomenon repeats in American economy every 12 to 15 years. Americans were quick to realize that second world war was the single most important factor for US economy to bounce back from “The Great Depression of 30s”. Here are some interesting facts:-

    ReplyDelete
  5. 1. In 1939 (start of war), US GNP was 1.5%. At the end of war in 1945, the GNP reached 40%.
    2. Americans spent more than $185 billion between 1940 to 45. If we take 10% growth, this amounts to $ 56329 billion in today’s money.
    3. American corporations such as Ford, GM, and ITT produced all sorts of planes and tanks and other martial toys for the Nazi’s through out the war.
    4. As far as ordinary Americans were concerned, Washington’s military spending orgy brought not only virtually full employment but also much higher wages than ever before; it was during the Second World War that the widespread misery associated with the Great Depression came to an end and that a majority of the American people achieved an unprecedented degree of prosperity.
    5. However, the greatest beneficiaries by far of the wartime economic boom were the country’s businesspeople and corporations, who realized extraordinary profits.

    US statesmen and corporates have learnt this lesson too well. War feeds economy and economy feeds war – A self-fulfilling prophecy, a vicious cycle. The phenomenon is so self evident that President Eisenhower warned US senate and US statesmen against this evil trap when the Second World War ended. He termed this phenomenon as “Military-Industrial Complex”. Has this helped all Americans? No, not at all. Lo and behold, “Military-Industrial Complex” is a govt. sponsored nation’s wealth re-distribution scheme. It makes rich more richer (read American corporates and politicians) and poor more poor (average American). On one hand corporates enjoy huge profits, on the other hand they are taxed the least to recognize their valuable contribution for nationalistic causes. Who pays the price? American middle and low class society. However, post Vietnam war it became evident that common American could not be fooled anymore, American Govt. and corporates changed the tack. Now war fighting (and profiteering) is a joint and participative activity between US and its other NATO allies (does anyone remember the structure of Gulf wars, Afghan war, war on terror?). Low risk but high gains none-the-less.

    Before I am accused of indulging in “America Bashing”, let me reassure you that this was never the motive. The purpose of this article is to find the reasons why any Govt. undertakes racial profiling. There are much larger forces at play than what a common man thinks. The direct impact of racial profiling such as feeling of anger, disgust, revolt, suspicion etc. easily masks what evil is about to be unleashed at an unprecedented scale.


    Signing off until we meet again
    Ajit

    ReplyDelete